_SLIDE_1_
¥°. History of Venture Capital in Korea and China
¥°. History of Korean venture capital
venture capital¢¡ institution that could assist the nation by funding technology development. Not a mechanism for creating individual wealth.
Recent
Evolution
Birth
1981(KTDC)
Industry R&D projects
1986-1996
Permit and fax treatment
changed some regulations
_SLIDE_2_
¥°.History of Venture Capital in Korea and China
¥±.History of Chinese venture capital
Recent
Evolution
Birth
end of 1980s to the middle of 1990s
1998~2004
most active
And rapid growth
Science and Technology ¢¡ critical part of search for economic development and national security
1985, Reform of the science and technology system
_SLIDE_3_
2.Comparison of VC between Korea and China
¥°. General comparison
KOREA
CHINA
No. VC firms
146
246
Total VC(billion $)
5.69
3.6
Total investment(billion $)
2.51
0.6
Average return rate of¡¦(»ý·«)
|
nt types
Equity investment
Convertible bond
Project investment
others
% of total
80%
7%
3%
10%
2001
_SLIDE_8_
¥£. Distribution of investment by industry
_SLIDE_9_
Korea
-Interestingly, prior to 2009, IT companies received the lion¡¯s share of VC investment.
Why IT is receiving less attention from VCs:
-Korean VCs lack of familiarity with emerging technology
-the low cost of developing technologies ¢¡less investment
_SLIDE_10_
¥³. Comparison of VC exiting
Korea
Capital recovery through IPO 52%
Acquisition and second sale 45%
Others 3%
China
IPO 6%
Acquisition 43%
Buy back 16%
Write-Off 18%
Others 17%
China had much less IPO exit than Korea
Main exit strategy
_SLIDE_11_
Behind the difference of venture capital in two countries
3. Analysis of VC-direted policy
_SLIDE_12_
3.1 Investment regulation and its influence on venture capital
¥°. The different investment regulation between Korea and China
Institutional investors to invest in the venture