Á¤µ¿¿. 1993. ¿¬±¸¹æ¹ý·Ð ºÐ¼®¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ ¹®ÇåÁ¤º¸ÇÐ À̷а³¹ß¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸. ꡔÁ¤º¸°ü ¸®ÇÐȸÁöꡕ, 10(2): 23-41. Á¶Âù½Ä. 1999. ¹®ÇåÁ¤º¸ÇÐ ¿¬±¸ ¹× ¿¬±¸¹æ¹ý¿¡ °üÇÑ °íÂû. ꡔÇѱ¹¹®ÇåÁ¤º¸ÇÐȸÁöꡕ, 33(3): 45-61. Atkins, S. E. 1988. `Subject trends in library and information science research, 1975-1984.` Library Trends, 36: 633-658. Boyce, B. R. & D. R. Kraft. 1985. `Principles and theories in information science.` Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 20: 153-178. Cronin, B. & K. Overfelt. 1994. `Citation-based auditing of academic performance.` Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45: 61-72. Davis, C. H. & B. Cronin. 1993. `Acknowledgement and intellectual indebtedness: A bibliometric confecture.` Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 44: 590-592. Freehan, P. E., W. L. Gragg, W. M. Havener, D. D. Kester. 1987. `Library and information science research: An analysis of the 1984 journals literature.` Library and Information Science Research, 9: 173-185. Grover, R. & Glazier, J. 1986. `A conceptual framework for theory building in library and information science.` Library and Information Science Research 8: 227-242. Hj∅rland, B. 1998. `Theory and metatheory of information science: A new interpretation.` Journal of Documentation 54(5): 606-621. Jaervelin, K. & P. Vakkari. 1990. `Content Analysis of Research Articles in Library and Information Science.` Library and Information Science Research 12(4): 395-421. Julien, H., & L. J. Duggan. 2000. A longitudinal analysis of the information needs and uses literature. Library and Information Science Research, 22(3), 291-309. Kumpulainen, S. 1991. `Library and information science research in 1975: Content analysis of the journal articles.` Libri, 41: 59-76. McKechnie, L., & K. E. Pettigrew. 2002. `Surveying the use of theory in library and information science research: a disciplinary perspective.` Library Trends, 50(3), 406-417. Mularski, C. A. 1991. `Institutional affiliations of authors of research articles in library and information science: Updating.` Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 31: 179-186. Nour, M. M. 1985. `A quantitative analysis of the research articles published in core library journals of 1980.` Library and Information Science Research 7: 261-273. Peritz, B. C. 1980. `The methods of library science research: Some results from a bibliometric study.` Library Research, 2: 251-268. Persson, O. 1994. `The intellectual base and research fronts of JASIS 1986-1990.` Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45: 31-38. Pettigrew, Karen E. & P. T. Nicholls. 1994. `Publication patterns of LIS faculty from 1982-1992: Effects of doctoral programs.` Library and Information Science Research, 16: 139-156. Shackel, B. 1997. `Human-computer interaction¡ªWhence and whither?` Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48: 970-986. Spink, A. 1997. `Information science: A third feedback framework.` Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48: 728-740. Varlejs, J. & P. Dalrymple. 1986. `Publication output of library and information science faculty.` Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 27: 71-89. Vakkari, P. 1997. `Information seeking in context: A challenging metatheory.` in Information Seeking in Context: Proceedings of an International Conference on Research in Information Needs, Seeking and Use in Different Contexts. edited by Vakkari, R. Sabolainen, & B. Dervin. London: Graham Taylor. 451-464. White, H. D. & K. W. McCain. 1998. `Visualizing a discipline: An author co-citation analysis of information science, 1975-1995.` Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 49: 327-355. Zweizig, D. & B. Dervin. l977. `Public library use, users, uses: Advances in knowledge of the characteristics and needs of the adult clientele of American public libraries.` Advances in Librarianship, 7: 231-255.
|